• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB B7

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB B7 Back to Search Results
Model Number 07"
Device Problems Device Inoperable (1663); Device Operational Issue (2914); Maintenance Does Not Comply To Manufacturers Recommendations (2974)
Patient Problem Caustic/Chemical Burns (2549)
Event Date 07/05/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported by company rep that during process of cleaning the tub, full strength, undiluted chemicals were being added to the tub.It is suspected that they splashed on to the employee's forearm, causing a chemical burn.Plastic gloves were being worn as a ppe (personal protective equipment), however they did not cover the forearms.From received info chemical burn to the caregiver occurred as a result of this incident, due to suspected exposure of undiluted chemical to the forearm.No info about further outcomes were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).When reviewing similar reportable events for height adjustable bath we haven't found any other similar cases.We have been able to establish that there is no complaint trend concerning these kind of events - subjection to disinfectant.The device was inspected by an arjohuntleigh rep at the customer site and found to be out of the spec.The device was being used for pt handling and in that way contributed to the event.Chemical burn occurred as a result of this incident to the caregiver.Complained product is subject to wear and tear.List of recommended steps can be found in product ifu: we have not been able to find any contributing mfg anomalies.Received info showed that the customer was aware of non-functional disinfection unit and had to disinfect device manually.Described event showed that "it is suspected that they [disinfectant] splashed on to the employee's forearm".The splash is not likely to be caused by device itself and these kind of events are considered to be unfortunate accidents.There are also other factors that need to appear to cause this incident e.G: lack of carefulness, incorrect process of disinfection.Therefore, we consider this event to be isolated incident where user wasn't care enough to avoid this incident.Date of last training was not provided, as well as date of last maintenance.Incident description form informs only that last maintenance was made by the customer.We can consider that root cause of this incident is related to user error - not correctly functioning device was used, poor maintenance - disinfection unit was not repaired and normal wear - device was in use for about 21 years.The received info and our eval as described above are showing that if maintenance was followed in accordance ifu, there would be no pt or caregiver at risk.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
B7
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB
verkstadsvagen 5
eslov 2412 1
SW  24121
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJO HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT AB
verkstadsvagen 5
eslov 2412 1
SW   24121
Manufacturer Contact
pamela wright
verkstadsvagen 5, box 61
san antonio, TX 78247
2102787040
MDR Report Key4217292
MDR Text Key19089991
Report Number9611530-2014-00053
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ILM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/08/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/30/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number07"
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA07/29/2014
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/08/2014
Device Age21 NA
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer07/29/2014
Date Manufacturer Received07/08/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/01/1993
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-