The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A device history review was conducted.The report indicates that for part # 497.254, lot# 4833047 indicate that the reported product was manufactured at the (b)(4) manufacturing facility on 12/13/2004 under work order 838478.Dhr records indicate that the product lot was manufactured in accordance with all established requirements with no nonconformities reported.Dhr records for part # 497.254, lot# 4833047 further indicates that the product lot underwent all specified inspection requirements with no product nonconformities reported.Dhr records for p/n 497.254, lot# 4833047 indicate that the product lot was produced from raw material tialnbfi120.00x18.00, p/n 24019, lot# 4772776 in accordance with established specifications.Dhr records for raw material tialnbfi120.00x18.00, p/n 240195, lot# 4772776 indicate that the raw material was received at the (b)(4) facility on 10/04/2004 and released to inventory on 10/04/2004.Dhr records for the raw material lot further indicate that the raw material underwent all specified inspection and testing requirements and was found to meet all established criteria for acceptance and use as intended.There is no objective evidence within the dhr for the reported product indicating that its manufacturing processes contributed to the reported complaint category - product related, synthes: broken : postoperatively.(b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|