• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC BUSH SINGLE LUMEN URETERAL ILLUMINATING CATHETER SET; FCS CATHETER, LIGHT FIBEROPTIC, GLASS, URTERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC BUSH SINGLE LUMEN URETERAL ILLUMINATING CATHETER SET; FCS CATHETER, LIGHT FIBEROPTIC, GLASS, URTERAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number J-BICS-058020
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 10/23/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Doctor started surgery with cystoscopy for endometriosis.During the surgery doctor decided to do laparoscopy.Laparoscopy wasn't enough so they moved to laparotomy.After laparoscopy they took the illuminating catheter out and left it to lie on top of patient's leg.They also had to move the power source to make more room for the next procedure.They kept lights on the catheter and after a while they noticed a smell like something was burning.After surgery they noticed that the illuminating catheter was broken and had burned the covers under the catheter and also burned a small mark on the patients leg.The patient did not require any additional procedures nor experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Event is still under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During investigation, a review of functional test, complaint history, drawings, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), quality control (qc) procedures, and a visual inspection was conducted.One used product was returned for evaluation.Customer stated "the light stent had snapped during an operation and the black part from the point of snapping had melted onto the patient's leg bag.This was noticed when the smell of burning was noticed in the theatre.The wire was hot both from where it had broken and the adapter end, so it could not immediately be detached from the light source." the returned catheter was examined.The black optical fiber seemed to have been placed under tensile force while at a high temperature.As can be seen in the investigation photos, the black material of the fiber had been necked down and snapped off at the interface of the trt tubing.The optical fiber/trt bond did not break.There was no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specification.A functional test was performed in the engineering lab with a sample device and another manufacturers light source.The catheter was plugged in, turned to the highest light intensity setting and placed on the benchtop for an extended period of time (>4 hours.) no melting or damage due to heat was cased along the length of the entire device.The proximal aluminum hub became warm to the touch, but not so hot it would bum.The experiment was repeated after forcing a failure (snapping light cable in half inside sheath) with the same results.There was a small amount of warmth coming from the damaged area where the light was dispersed instead of forced to travel down the fiber, but there was not enough heat to cause melting.The ifu states "note: high-energy light sources such as xenon may cause overheating of the anodized aluminum plug.An appropriate adapter (available from most light source manufacturers) will ensure product safety and functionality." attachment complaint communication states that the light source used was a xenon light source.Evidence displayed indicated the device had been exposed to high energy too long.When the device was draped over the patient's leg and the light source moved, the plug made contact with the catheter cable, causing it to melt as well as bum the patients leg.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and monitoring for similar complaints will continue.
 
Event Description
Doctor started surgery with cystoscopy for endometriosis.While in progress the doctor decided to do laparoscopy, but then reconsidered to laparotomy.After laparoscopy they took the illuminating catheter out and placed it on top of the patient's legs they also moved the power source leaving the lights on at the catheter.After awhile a burning odor was detected.After completion of the procedure, they noticed that the illuminating catheter was broken and had burned the covers under the catheter and caused a small burn mark on the patient's leg.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BUSH SINGLE LUMEN URETERAL ILLUMINATING CATHETER SET
Type of Device
FCS CATHETER, LIGHT FIBEROPTIC, GLASS, URTERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool, manager
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key4287597
MDR Text Key5189687
Report Number1820334-2014-00611
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FCS
UDI-Device Identifier00827002167377
UDI-Public(01)00827002167377(17)170501(10)4992427
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K923436
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Unknown,distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Unknown
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/23/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/07/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/01/2017
Device Catalogue NumberJ-BICS-058020
Device Lot Number4992427
Other Device ID Number(01)00827002167377(17)17050(10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/20/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/23/2014
Device Age5 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received10/24/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-