• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 310CJ27
Device Problem Structural Problem (2506)
Patient Problem Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
Event Date 11/13/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A visual examination of the device was performed upon receipt.The stent posts appeared slightly bent.Device analysis confirmed the cuspal tears.The holes and elongations in the right cusp appeared to be due to repeated contact of the leaflet with the base suture line.The hole closer to the left/right inferior coaptive area exhibited characteristics of cloth or suture contact wear, but does not appear to have been due to contact with the base suture.It is possible that a long suture tail on the ventricular aspect of the sewing ring was in contact with the leaflet in this location, but due to the absence of a large portion of the sewing ring and implant sutures, there was no way to confirm this possibility.All wear in this leaflet was likely related to positioning of the right cusp well above the inflow plane of the stent.Tissue deterioration was also observed in the septal shelf or muscle bar on the right cusp.The loss of myocardium was secondary to the wear/holes, as they would have allowed exposure of the underlying myocardium, leading to a host reaction.Pannus was also observed.Radiography performed at medtronic showed no evidence of calcification.The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Based on the received information and the returned product analysis, the reported regurgitation was most likely due to the cuspal tear and abrasion.The long suture tail wear, leaflets contacting with bias cloth, and stent distortion could be the potential causes of the cuspal tears.Cuspal tear is a known failure mode and is addressed in the current device risk management files.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately two years after the implant of this bioprosthetic tissue valve, the valve was explanted and replaced with another manufacturer¿s device due to moderate/severe central mitral regurgitation.Upon explant, visual inspection noted one of the valve leaflets had two perforations.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4308375
MDR Text Key12855023
Report Number2025587-2014-00995
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/23/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/09/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/12/2015
Device Model Number310CJ27
Device Catalogue Number310CJ27
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/17/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/23/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured10/29/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-