Model Number BME18175 |
Device Problems
Labelling, Instructions for Use or Training Problem (1318); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
No Code Available (3191); Cancer (3262)
|
Event Date 10/28/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The patient was diagnosed with bone tumour of the left distal femur and underwent a procedure with a stanmore custom minimally invasive grower distal femur replacement implant in (b)(6) 2008.Between 2009 and 2013, the patient underwent multiple lengthening procedures.In early 2014, the surgeon revised the minimally invasive prosthesis to be a non-invasive grower while keeping the original tibial component in situ.The patient underwent successful non-invasive leg lengthening procedures using a reusable grower unit in early 2014.However, it was reported that the distal femur implant did not appear to lengthen during two leg lengthening procedures that occurred on (b)(6) 2014.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is ongoing.A preliminary investigation for the complaint revealed that the company did not provide the distributor with the grower drive instructions for use (ifu) when the reusable unit was initially shipped to the distributor.Consequently, the distributor did not provide the facility with an ifu for the grower drive unit.This document was recently supplied to the distributor who has restrained its sales team.Capa (b)(4) has been initiated and the distributor has been issues a scar (supplier corrective action #064-14).A supplemental report will be provided.This custom jts distal femur replacement implant is similar jts extendible distal femoral implant (k133152).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation concluded that the root cause of this event was due to a manufacturing issue.On initial receipt of the reported event, the event description was reviewed and with the limited information available at that time, a decision was made to report the event.However on completion of the investigation into the reported event it can now be concluded that the incident does not meet the three basic reporting criteria referenced in 21 cfr part 803 as a marketed device did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or a marketed device has not malfunctioned where the malfunction of the device or a similar marketed device would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.Product surveillance will continue to monitor for trends.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was diagnosed with bone tumour of the left distal femur and underwent a procedure with a stanmore custom minimally invasive grower distal femur replacement implant in (b)(6) 2008.Between 2009 and 2013, the patient underwent multiple lengthening procedures.In early 2014, the surgeon revised the minimally invasive prosthesis to be a non-invasive grower while keeping the original tibial component in situ.The patient underwent successful non-invasive leg lengthening procedures using a reusable grower unit in early 2014.However, it was reported that the distal femur implant did not appear to lengthen during two leg lengthening procedures that occurred on (b)(6) 2014.This is a supplemental report to 30040105610-2014-00051 (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|