Catalog Number 2561232 |
Device Problem
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Tingling (2171)
|
Event Date 10/13/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a "tlif procedure at l4-l5 and a l4-l5 posterior artrothesis.The loop cage was well positioned inter operatory." approximately 2 weeks post-op, the cage migarated.The patient experienced "leg pain and paraesthesia due to this event".The patient underwent a revision procedure to remove the cage.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4): the device was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.A review of radiographic images show an l4/5 tlif procedure performed with pedicle screws and a loop cage.The initial films show ideal position of all components.Actual sizing of the cage and tightness of fit cannot be determined via x-ray.The final lateral view verifies migration of the cage posteriorly.There is reported leg pain that has accompanied this retropulsion.The markers within the cage do not show any change in the geometry that would allow migration therefore no specific reason for migration can be provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: analysis of the returned device shows that visual and optical examination identified material deformation around the area the inserter interfaces, consistent with implant and subsequent explantation.Dimensional inspection of relevant dimensions confirmed returned implant to be conforming to print specification.After visual, optical and dimensional inspection, no evidence was found that would suggest a defect in manufacturing or processing of the implant or associated components; unable to determine root cause of the foregoing event from the available information.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|