• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK448
Device Problems Component Missing (2306); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/25/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ultraflex covered esophageal stent was implanted within the esophagus during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, following a transthoracic esophageal cardia resection, the stent was implanted to treat a leakage near the proximal anastomose site and 23 cm from the incisors.Reportedly, the patient¿s anatomy was not tortuous.On (b)(6) 2014, the physician noted that there was persistent leakage in the patients esophagus.The stent was removed and it was noted that a portion of the stent cover was missing and the remaining cover was damaged.The procedure was completed by implanting another ultraflex esophageal stent at the leakage site.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complainant was unable to report the upn and lot number; therefore, the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.However, the complainant stated that the device was used prior to the expiration date.(b)(4) for the reported event of stent cover missing.(b)(4) for the reported event of stent cover damage.The device has been received for analysis; however the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A visual examination of the returned device found that only the deployed stent was returned for analysis.The stent measured 90mm in length and 23mm in diameter.The stent cover was torn horizontally and longitudinally at several locations along its length.On one side of the stent the cover measured 35mm in length and had no further tears.On another side of the stent the cover was 50mm in length and had several longitudinal tears.The stent cover appeared blue in parts and a section had detached.Device analysis determined that the condition of the returned device was consistent with the complaint incident.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labeled indications.This device is intended for maintaining esophageal luminal patency in esophageal strictures caused by intrinsic or extrinsic malignant tumors only.This device was used to treat a leakage after surgery as a curative intent.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification is user error.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ultraflex covered esophageal stent was implanted within the esophagus during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, following a transthoracic esophageal cardia resection, the stent was implanted to treat a leakage near the proximal anastomose site and 23 cm from the incisors.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous.On (b)(6) 2014, the physician noted that there was persistent leakage in the patients esophagus.The stent was removed and it was noted that a portion of the stent cover was missing and the remaining cover was damaged.The procedure was completed by implanting another ultraflex esophageal stent at the leakage site.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key4334249
MDR Text Key5216701
Report Number3005099803-2014-03966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ESW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K955347
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/25/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/16/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK448
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/01/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-