Devices were returned and evaluated.The journey uni femoral and tibial baseplate components had bone cement and bone on growth on the grit-blasted surface.The bone cement and bone on growth appeared well adhered to the component as it did not become dislodged with the manual application of force by hand.The articulating surface appeared intact.The baseplate showed signs of burnishing on the superior surface.The journey uni tibial baseplate was also fractured.Examination of the fracture surfaces via scanning electron microscopy indicated that burnishing marks were present on the fracture surfaces.Burnishing marks can be indicative of a component failing due to metal fatigue cracking.The baseplate potentially fractured by the initiation and subsequent propagation of metal fatigue cracking.The fatigue cracking eventually propagated to an extent that the remaining cross-sectional area of the baseplate could not bear the imposed patient loading, which led to an overload fracture.The journey uni tibial insert showed signs of wear marks and deformation on the superior articulating surface.The insert inferior surface showed signs of deformation consistent with dissociation from the baseplate, indicating the insert was likely positioned on top of the baseplate locking mechanism.It is unknown if this damage occurred prior to or after the fracture of the baseplate.The insert also showed signs of metal particulate embedment on the inferior surface.This particulate embedment was likely caused due to the aforementioned micro-motion between the baseplate and the insert.The posterior lock of the insert showed signs of deformation that are consistent with the insert not being properly locked within the baseplate.On december 23, 2009, smith & nephew initiated a voluntary recall of all lots of journey uni tibial baseplates.Corrective actions were implemented to prevent recurrence of this failure mode.Credit cannot be issued for the devices.
|