Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: the subject device was explanted but the exact date of explant is unknown.Explant/revision surgery reportedly was performed approximately 12 weeks after the unknown implant date in july 2014.A manufacturing investigation was performed for the subject device (va-lcp condylar plate, part 02.124.419s).The manufacturing investigation included the inspection of the subject device dimensions, examination of the fracture surfaces by scanning electron microscopy (sem), and review of the manufacturing documents, technical drawings and the raw-material inspections sheets.The subject device was made of material (b)(4) (stainless steel).The examination of the raw-material inspection sheet from the supplier and the manufacturing documents of the producer showed no deviation in relation to chemical composition, microstructure and mechanical properties.The dimensions of the subject device were checked using a digital sliding caliper and were found to be in compliance with the technical drawings.The macroscopic examination revealed corrosion and mechanical damage from the locking attachment plates, observed at the proximal end of the subject device.The sem evaluation concluded that the subject device failure was caused by fatigue and overload.In conclusion, based on the topography of the fracture surfaces, it can be concluded that the subject device was subjected to low dynamic bending loads (one sided).Constantly alternating bending loads / load cycles (during walking) led to the fatigue of the material, then to a first crack and finally to the overload respectively to the fatigue fracture of the va-lcp condylar plate (subject device).The subject device could not resist the applied force which finally led to the material overload i fatigue failure.A failure resulting from either a material defect or the manufacturing process can be excluded.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device used for treatment not diagnosis.Implant, (b)(6) 2014, exact date is unknown.The part was received; an evaluation is currently in progress.A review of the device history record did not reveal conditions that could have contributed to the reported event.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|