• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4002C1660
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/27/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using a penumbra coil 400.During the procedure, physician experienced resistance while attempting to remove the coil from the microcatheter (a non-penumbra device).The coil was removed and the procedure continued with no further issue.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: the penumbra coil 400 was intact with the pusher assembly.The proximal end of the pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm from the end.The pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The renegade hi-flow microcatheter (non-penumbra device) was ovalized approximately 10.5 cm from the distal tip.The outer diameter of the coil, distal detachment tip (ddt), and pusher assembly were measured and determined to be within specification.Conclusion: the complaint has been evaluated.The complaint indicates that the penumbra coil 400 was inserted through a renegade hi-flow catheter (non-penumbra device) and a strong resistance was felt.Evaluation of the returned product revealed that the distal shaft of the renegade hi-flow microcatheter was ovalized.If this ovalization was present when attempting to advance the coil, strong resistance, as described in the complaint, would be encountered.The kink in the proximal end of the pusher assembly was likely related to attempts to advance the coil against resistance.The penumbra coil 400 devices are 100% functionally tested and visually inspected for damage during process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key4354567
MDR Text Key5220899
Report Number3005168196-2014-00897
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/25/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number4002C1660
Device Lot NumberF44806
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/17/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/25/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age84 YR
-
-