• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HEMOSPHERE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT-PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HEMOSPHERE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT-PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Model Number HERO 1002
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Vascular System (Circulation), Impaired (2572)
Event Date 12/13/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to the article, modification of the hero graft allowing earlier cannulation and reduction in catheter dependent days in patients with end stage renal disease: a single center retrospective review, one patient developed dialysis associated steal syndrome that required ligation.The hero graft was removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the article, modification of the hero graft allowing earlier cannulation and reduction in catheter dependent days in patients with end stage renal disease: a single center retrospective review, one patient developed dialysis associated steal syndrome that required ligation.The hero graft was removed.Additional information was received on 1/23/2015.The patient's date of implant was (b)(6) 2012 and the date of ligation (banding) was (b)(6) 2012.Multiple attempts were made to gain additional information, including the lot numbers, date of implant, date of adverse event, and information surrounding the events.This information was requested from the cryolife representative, on 12/18/2014; to which no response was received.Information was again requested from the representative on 1/12/2015.He responded that he reached out by email and phone to contact diane, dr.(b)(6) access coordinator; she indicated she will compile all available information.The cryolife representative emailed (b)(6) again on 1/20/2015 requesting additional information.Diane responded that she was working on it.(b)(6) emailed the representative on 1/23/2015 giving the date of implant and the date of intervention.She stated, "that is all i can get for you." a query was performed for all lot numbers shipped to the hospital for the six months prior to the date of implant, (b)(6) 2012.Three possible lot numbers were identified 0001612, 0001765, and 0001782.The manufacturing records for lots 0001612, 0001765, and 0001782 were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled available for review, and met all specifications per device master record.The hero graft instructions for use (ifu) lists vascular insufficiency due to steal syndrome as a potential complication.Table 2 of the ifu shows steal syndrome ranging from 2.6% to 3.8% for hero, and 3.8% in arterio-venous graft (avg).Steal syndrome is not unique to hero graft and is a well known complication of hemodialysis conduits may be managed by ligation and/ or explant.All of the patients report in this series had procedure modification to include flixene graft attached to a small portion fo the agc.This is a modification to the device, so cryolife cannot support this modification as it is not an approved indication/ modification to the device.The ifu provides adequate instructions to implant the graft in the approved configuration but no allowance is made for off label use.Clinical outcomes with a modified device have not been evaluated by cryolife.According to the available information a patient developed steal syndrome following implant of the hero graft.Since the hero graft shunts arterial blood in the venous system steal syndrome is a known potential complication.Surgical technique could potentially increase the risk of steal syndrome.Adequate warnings and precautions are listed in the ifu.The root cause for the reported event is excessive shunting of arterial blood into the venous circulation.Steal syndrome is a known potential complication of the hero graft.The root cause for the reported event is excessive shunting of arterial blood into the venous circulation.This event represents known potential complications of the hero graft which are outlined in the device's ifu.These known potential complications are common among all arteriovenous grafts, and do not suggest that there is a deficiency in the hero or the hero ifu.There is no evidence to suggest that an error occurred in processing or production.There is no indication that an error or deficiency occurred at cryolife and the ifu adequately communicates risk.
 
Event Description
According to the article, modification of the hero graft allowing earlier cannulation and reduction in catheter dependent days in patients with end stage renal disease: a single center retrospective review, one patient developed dialysis associated steal syndrome that required ligation.The hero graft was removed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HERO GRAFT
Type of Device
VASCULAR GRAFT-PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
HEMOSPHERE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd. nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer (Section G)
HEMOSPHERE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd. nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer Contact
sandra o'reilly
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
7704193355
MDR Report Key4357223
MDR Text Key5238142
Report Number3006945290-2014-00109
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/23/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberHERO 1002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/10/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-