Country of complaint: (b)(6).During corporectomy lwk 2 and 3 the surgeon tried to distract the hydrolift sv018t with an fw450su / hydrolift hydraulic applicator.At 26 bar, pressure the connection tube burst.Surgeon obtained a second fw450su, the connection bursts again, at 25 bar.Implant was removed and tested with a third fw450su outside the body.On the first 10mm they noticed a slip stick effect, then the hydrolift distracted without problems.Tested outside until 20 bar.Surgeon implanted the hydrolift again and tried the distraction again.Luerlock connector bursts at 24 bar.Some of the nacl solution sprayed up on the unsterile luminaire and dripped into the pt.The trial to distract the hydrolift manually miscarried.Surgeon explanted the hydrolift and used an ullrich obelisk successfully.The pt was given 7 days of antibiotics.
|
Us reporting agent notified on (b)(4) 2014.Manufacturing site evaluation: visual inspection: the hydrolift arrived decontaminated without original box.The implant exhibits no damages.Distraction test: tested the implant with an merit blue diamond inflation device.Result: up to 30 bar, the hydrolift shows no leakage.No abnormality (such as sticking) was noted.Conclusion: the described error could not be detected, the implant works without any abnormality, no failure could be found.
|