• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4002C0935
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Retraction Problem (1536); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/13/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Result: the penumbra coil 400 was detached from the pusher assembly.The pet lock on the proximal end of the pusher assembly was intact.The proximal constraint sphere was still intact with the coil.The pull wire was inside the distal detachment tip (ddt).The ddt was not damaged.The inner diameter of the ddt was measured within specification.The outer diameter of the coil, proximal constraint sphere, pusher assembly, and the pull wire were measured within specification.Conclusion: the complaint has been evaluated.The complaint indicates that resistance was felt during the retraction of the coil, then it detach inside the px slim microcatheter.Evaluation of the returned product confirmed that the penumbra coil 400 was detached from the pusher assembly.This detachment might have occurred due to the force used during retraction of the coil and the resistance felt.The force use could have likely exceeded the compression strength of the ddt capture features mechanism.This is what keeps the coil intact with the pusher assembly.The outer diameter of the coil, pusher assembly, pull wire, and proximal constraint sphere were measured within specification.It is not clear if the px slim delivery microcatheter was damaged and caused resistance during the retraction of the coil.The px slim delivery microcatheter was not returned for evaluation.The root cause of this complaint cannot be determined.These devices are 100% functional tested during process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using a penumbra coil 400 and a px slim delivery microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while retracting the coil through the px slim.The coil unintentionally detached within the pxslim and both devices were removed from the patient.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This mdr is associated with mdr 3005168196-2014-00919.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
1351 harbor bay parkway
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key4371996
MDR Text Key17518308
Report Number3005168196-2014-00918
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/30/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date04/30/2019
Device Catalogue Number4002C0935
Device Lot NumberF42916
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/12/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/01/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/25/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-