It was reported tha organism identification discrepancies were noted between microscan positive combo panel type 33 and microscan rapid positive id panel type 2 isolates taken from the same bap purity plate were identified as high probability kocuria kristinae (96.55%) and low probability staphylococcus lugdunensis (1.52%) on microscan positive combo panel type 33 ((b)(4)) on both initial and repeat test.Another method was set up using microscan rapid positive id panel type 2 ((b)(4)) resulting in high probability staphylococcus lugdunensis (99.99%) on both initial and repeat tests.The isolate was submitted to a reference laboratory for identification testing and resulted as high probability of staphylococcus lugdunensis.It is unknown what testing method was used by the reference laboratory to attain the organism id.The customer reported that the identification was previously finalized s coagulase negative staphylococcus species.Upon receipt of the results from the reference laboratory, the final identification was changed to staphylococcus lugdunensis and reported to the physician.There was no report of adverse event or injury associated with the discrepant results.
|