• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD CUSTOM JTS NON-INVASIVE DISTAL FEMORAL IMPLANT; LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD CUSTOM JTS NON-INVASIVE DISTAL FEMORAL IMPLANT; LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number BME17178
Device Problem Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping (2912)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Cancer (3262)
Event Date 11/01/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the surgeon that during a distal femur replacement procedure that the collar on the uncemented reamer was assembled incorrectly.This was rectified on removal from the sterile packaging.Reaming of the femoral canal was then performed with no concerns raised.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is inspected and cleaned in parts and then assembled in the clean room following the wash process.The assembled device is then inspected by the design team before release to a sub contractor for the irradiation process.The mfg records were reviewed and no non-conformances were identified, therefore, it is assumed that the device left siw conforming.It is not possible to identify when or where this device was altered.The device has not been returned, therefore, a visual inspection has not been possible.Current info is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the reported event.Requests are being made for additional info and a supplemental report will be provided if this info is received.Please note that this custom implant is similar to the mets modular distal femur implant (k121056).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
In 2012 the device was inspected, cleaned in parts and then assembled in the clean room following the wash process.The assembled device was then inspected by the design team before release to a sub-contractor for the irradiation process.The manufacturing records were reviewed and no non-conformances were identified, therefore it is assumed that the device left siw conforming.It is not possible to identify when or where this device was altered.The device has not been returned; therefore a visual inspection has not been possible.Current information available is insufficient to permit a conclusion for the cause of the reported event.The current day product release process now includes a final visual inspection and a review of the dhr by quality assurance to help ensure that the correct components in the correct configuration are shipped out.The design proposal and operation drawing provided for the surgeon ensures that the surgeon is informed of the configuration of the implant components.This complaint is being closed and is being tracked and trended.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the surgeon that during a distal femur replacement procedure that the collar on the uncemented reamer was assembled incorrectly.This was rectified on removal from the sterile packaging.Reaming of the femoral canal was then performed with no concerns raised.This is a supplemental report to 3004105610-2014-00119 (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the device history record confirms that the product was shipped to specification.Based on a review of the provided x-ray information, the reported tibial stem loosening was confirmed.There is no indication that the observed stem loosening was device related as no device or manufacturing related issues have been identified.It is noted that the tibial stem has, by design, a sliding fit within the medullary canal to allow growth of the proximal tibial bone.The device did not reach maximum extension, but had aseptically loosened.The cause of the failure could not be determined, though aseptic loosening was confirmed through the scan review.Aseptic loosening is a well-known complication for orthopaedic implants which can occur early or late.There were no reported complications with the revision surgery.This complaint is being closed, and is being tracked and trended.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the surgeon that the patient underwent a primary procedure to implant a noninvasive extendible distal femur implant on (b)(6) 2009 and subsequently was revised on (b)(6) 2012 due to the prosthesis reaching full extension.The patient is also reporting pain.This is a final supplemental report for 3004105610-201400119 (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CUSTOM JTS NON-INVASIVE DISTAL FEMORAL IMPLANT
Type of Device
LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD
210 centennial avenue
centennial park
elstree, WD6 3 SJ
UK  WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD
210 centennial avenue
centennial park
elstree, WD6 3 SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer Contact
diana rogers
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood, WD6 3-SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
2082386500
MDR Report Key4390405
MDR Text Key21773962
Report Number3004105610-2014-00119
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K133152
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,foreign,health professi
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2012
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/23/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/21/2012
Device Model NumberBME17178
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/21/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age8 YR
-
-