Device Problem
Device Issue (2379)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/16/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
A nurse reported that the cutter would not work during a vitreoretinal procedure.Additional information and product sample have been requested for this report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There was no probe sample returned for evaluation.A device history record review of the probe's lot was concluded.The product was released based on the manufacturer's acceptance criteria.No additional investigation is required based on the device history reviews.The root cause for the customer complaint issue cannot be determined.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: one sample was returned for evaluation.The sample was visually inspected using 25x magnification and found to be conforming.Actuation, aspiration, and cut testing were performed and all were found to be conforming.Actuation, aspiration, and cut testing were performed and all were found to be conforming.The probe was disassembled and the components inspected.There is less than 5 minutes of wear on the inner cutter when compared to wear visual standards.Device history record reviews show that the product was released based on the manufacturer's acceptance criteria.No additional investigation is required based on the device history reviews.A complaint history examination indicates one additional complaint was associated with the probe lots.The root cause for this complaint is unknown because the returned sample was conforming to specification.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|