• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYBRONENDO EPIPHANY; RESIN, ROOT CANAL FILLING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYBRONENDO EPIPHANY; RESIN, ROOT CANAL FILLING Back to Search Results
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A doctor alleged that two (2) patients had required endodontic re-treatment for root canals that had previously been filled with epiphany.This is the first of two (2) reports.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Specific patient information such as age and weight was not provided.The doctor reported that the initial root canal treatment was performed approximately five (5) years ago by a different endodontist and that epiphany root canal sealant material had been used for the initial procedure.The doctor diagnosed the tooth with a par lesion associated with the palatal root.The doctor cleaned the affected root canals in the patient's tooth, packed it with calcium hydroxide, and prescribed antibiotics for treatment.The doctor reported that black material was found within the root canal during re-treatment and removal of the epiphany material.The patient will return to the office at a later date for completion of the root canal procedure.At this time, the patient is doing fine.Sybronendo has requested that the customer report any new information with regard to this patient.An update will be provided if any new information becomes available.The product involved in the alleged incident was not returned and no lot number was provided; therefore, no further evaluation can be conducted.Upon the investigations of previous comparable incidents, it was found that the black material seen within the product was bismuth sulfide.It is produced by the reaction between bismuth oxychloride in the realseal root canal filler and a protein (most likely from a bodily fluid).The possible causes for the formation of bismuth sulfide are primarily due to technique variations and deviations from the instructions for use of the realseal system, and include overheating and incomplete flushing of naocl from the root canal.Overheating can degrade the realseal canal filler and possibly lead to improper sealing and leaking, which can result in the leeching of proteins into the root canal and subsequent bismuth sulfide formation.Failure to completely flush all naocl from the root canal can also result in the formation of bismuth sulfide.Retreatment of patients' root canals is required to remove bismuth sulfide.This mdr is being submitted because of the medical intervention for retreatment.The previous investigations led to the conclusion that the product itself, when used according to the instructions for use, performs as intended and yields acceptable results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPIPHANY
Type of Device
RESIN, ROOT CANAL FILLING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYBRONENDO
1332 south lone hill avenue
glendora CA 91740
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYBRONENDO
1332 south lone hill avenue
glendora CA 91740
Manufacturer Contact
kerri casino
1717 w. collins ave
orange, CA 92867
7145167634
MDR Report Key4438981
MDR Text Key5387394
Report Number2016150-2015-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KIF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K011748
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/31/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/21/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/31/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-