• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DFINE INC. STABILIT ER2 BONE CEMENT, SINGLE LEVEL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DFINE INC. STABILIT ER2 BONE CEMENT, SINGLE LEVEL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3366
Device Problem Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508)
Patient Problem Pulmonary Embolism (1498)
Event Date 12/02/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Date dfine became aware of incident was (b)(6) 2014 for complaint (b)(4).Fluoroscopically-guided single level thoracic t8 vertebral augmentation was performed on the patient on (b)(6) 2014 contributing to a cement embolism.The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion, 1% lidocaine was used as local anesthetic.Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 10 gauge trocar-tipped needle was advanced into the t8 vertebral body using a right sided transpedicular approach.Cavity creation was performed using a coaxial osteotome.Polymethylmethacrylate cement was then injected under direct fluoroscopic visualization by the physician.Appropriate filling of the fracture plane along the inferior endplate, as well as the remainder of the vertebral body above the fracture, was observed.Approx 6cc of total cement was injected.A small amount of venous filling was seen along a tiny anterior lumbar vein, measuring less than 1mm in size.The physician noted no worrisome cement extravasation identified during the procedure.The needle was removed and a bandage was applied to the patient, with no initial complication.The patient was discharged home per protocol, with no complications.Post procedure after leaving the medical facility, the patient went to the er later that evening having shortness of breath following a recent vertebroplasty procedure; during a ct scan it was noted that the cement had continued through the vein into the patient's lung.Ct images were reviewed demonstrating a curvilinear calcific opacity in the distal aspect of the right main pulmonary artery was well as the distal pulmonary arterial branch is widely patent.A second smaller curvilinear thin cement embolism was also seen in one of the left lower lobe pulmonary arterial branches.Cement embolism is secondary to filling a very tiny approx.1mm thoracic paravertebral vein.The patient was eventually discharged without further symptoms, regarding shortness of breath.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Stabilit er2 bone cement was implanted in the patient and not able to be returned for evaluation.Ifu 3380 revision ac, adverse events section.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STABILIT ER2 BONE CEMENT, SINGLE LEVEL
Type of Device
ER2 BONE CEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
DFINE INC.
3047 orchard parkway
san jose CA 95134
Manufacturer Contact
robert founds
3047 orchard parkway
san jose, CA 95134
4083219999
MDR Report Key4456941
MDR Text Key5327036
Report Number3006396387-2015-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072496
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Not Applicable
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2017
Device Catalogue Number3366
Device Lot NumberDF051
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/30/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
TO PROCEDURE AND NEED FOR FURTHER PAIN MAINTENANCE; PATIENT F/U AT 1,7, AND 14 DAYS TO ASSESS RESPONSE
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age72 YR
-
-