• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY XXL? VASCULAR; DILATOR, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY XXL? VASCULAR; DILATOR, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M001145100
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 01/07/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that tip detachment, catheter removal difficulties and balloon tear occurred.Vascular access was obtained via the popliteal vein.The target lesion was located in the popliteal artery.Angiojet was used from the knee up to the bifurcation.Two wallstents were implanted in the left common iliac vein.A 4/5.8/75 xxl¿ vascular balloon catheter was selected and advanced to post dilate the lesion.Upon removal, it was noted that the balloon was caught in the junction where the stents overlapped.The physician pushed and pulled the device; however the device was not removed.The physician jerked the balloon free, and ripped the balloon material.It was then noted that about one centimeter of the distal tip of the balloon catheter broke off in the body.The physician was able to get the detached tip down to the popliteal and out of the vein and into the subcutaneous tissue.However, the tip could not be removed any further.The physician elected to leave the tip in the patient¿s body.Venogram was performed to insure blood flow was not compromised.A 9 fr sheath was pulled out of the vein.Hemostasis was achieved.The procedure was completed with this device.No further patient complications were reported and the patient¿s status was fine.On the following day, the physician had a vascular surgeon review the case and stated that the tip would probably encapsulate and no further attempts would be needed to remove the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: the device was received inserted through an introducer sheath.An examination of the introducer sheath identified that it was kinked at the end of its strain relief.Exiting from the sheath was the distal end of the xxl device.An examination of the xxl identified that a complete circumferential tear with longitudinal tear had occurred in the balloon.The circumferential tear was located at 4cm distal to the proximal touch-up.A microscopic examination of the circumferential tear site identified a longitudinal tear in the balloon from the proximal transition zone to the site of the complete circumferential tear.The distal section of the balloon tear was not received and a break was evident in the shaft at 7cm distal to the distal edge of the proximal markerband.The distal section of the break including the tip and distal section of the balloon tear was not received for analysis.An examination of the break site in the shaft identified clear signs of excessive tensile force having been applied to the shaft.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that tip detachment, catheter removal difficulties and balloon tear occurred.Vascular access was obtained via the popliteal vein.The target lesion was located in the popliteal artery.Angiojet was used from the knee up to the bifurcation.Two wallstents were implanted in the left common iliac vein.A 4/5.8/75 xxl¿ vascular balloon catheter was selected and advanced to post dilate the lesion.Upon removal, it was noted that the balloon was caught in the junction where the stents overlapped.The physician pushed and pulled the device; however, the device was not removed.The physician jerked the balloon free, and ripped the balloon material.It was then noted that about one centimeter of the distal tip of the balloon catheter broke off in the body.The physician was able to get the detached tip down to the popliteal and out of the vein and into the subcutaneous tissue.However, the tip could not be removed any further.The physician elected to leave the tip in the patient¿s body.Venogram was performed to insure blood flow was not compromised.A 9 fr sheath was pulled out of the vein.Hemostasis was achieved.The procedure was completed with this device.No further patient complications were reported and the patient¿s status was fine.On the following day, the physician had a vascular surgeon review the case and stated that the tip would probably encapsulate and no further attempts would be needed to remove the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XXL? VASCULAR
Type of Device
DILATOR, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
ballybrit business park
galway
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key4466442
MDR Text Key5184027
Report Number2134265-2015-00157
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K952656
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/29/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/06/2017
Device Model NumberM001145100
Device Catalogue Number14-510
Device Lot Number0017435225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/16/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
STENT: TWO WALLSTENTS
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-