• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS ENDO II MOD ENDO HEAD SZ 54; PROSTHESIS, HIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS ENDO II MOD ENDO HEAD SZ 54; PROSTHESIS, HIP Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Metal Shedding Debris (1804); Residue After Decontamination (2325); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Scratched Material (3020)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Toxicity (2333); Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
Event Date 09/04/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Legal counsel reported patient underwent right total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2005.Legal counsel further reports patient allegations of pain and difficulty walking.No revision procedure has been reported to date.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff's complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.Additional information received from complaint report noted that the patient underwent a right hip revision on (b)(6) 2014.The presence of metallosis was noted during the revision procedure.The modular head and acetabular cup were removed and replaced.Additional information received in patient operative (op) report dated (b)(6) 2014 notes the presence of yellowish fibrous tissue, grayish capsular tissue, cloudy fluid, black residue on taper of neck and metal head, scratches on the head, and cup over-hang.The stem was well-fixed.Cup and head were removed and replaced with a unipolar head as a spacer.Subsequently, patient underwent a second revision procedure (b)(6) 2014 due to infection and recurrent dislocations.Revision op report further notes that the femoral shaft fractured below the trochanteric osteotomy that was performed to remove the well-fixed stem.The head and stem were removed and replaced with antibiotic spacers.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Review of device history records show that lot released with no recorded anomaly or associated deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: under possible adverse effects, it states: "dislocation and subluxation due to inadequate fixation and improper positioning." & "early or late postoperative infection and allergic reaction".This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff¿s complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.This report is number 4 of 4 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2014-05470 /-07601 & 2015-00412 / 00413).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDO II MOD ENDO HEAD SZ 54
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key4471467
MDR Text Key5562285
Report Number0001825034-2015-00413
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK984028
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/21/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/30/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date02/29/2024
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number12-139032
Device Lot Number209260
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/21/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/24/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
-
-