The device was returned for evaluation.Manufacturing device history records (dhr) were reviewed and the process & inspection plan shows all 65 received pieces of p/n (b)(4) lot ap15613 being accepted with no rejected pieces.All records indicate the product was manufactured to specifications.The returned device is missing the distal-most portion of the t25 driver feature, with the fracture plane being slightly askew with respect to a normal plane relative to the device's center-line axis.The remaining portion of the t25 driver shows a counter-clockwise torsional deformation in the remaining lobes, consistent with failure during clockwise torsional load application (tightening).In order for a t25 driver to fail in such a manner, loads greatly in excess of the recommended 7.4nm must have been applied.Per the approved surgical technique, the final tightening instrumentation was tested using a digital torque meter.All results were within specifications, eliminating a torque handle malfunction as the root cause of the driver breakage.Per the surgical technique, the driver tip should be fully inserted into the t25 recess in the locking cap before attempting final tightening maneuvers.The damage displayed by the returned device cap before attempting final tightening maneuver was performed with the t25 tip improperly engaged indicates that an "off-axis" tightening maneuver was performed with the t25 tip improperly engaged within the locking cap.It is likely that a torque limiting handle was not utilized in conjunction with a counter-torque, allowing the "off-axis" tightening as well as an over-application of torque.Due to the above findings, it must be concluded that an improper surgical technique was utilized.
|