The concerned device "lacrifast" is not distributed in us under this device name, but is identical to the device "lacriflow lacrimal stent" distributed in us under 510 (k) # k120886.The actual device used was returned and investigated: the stainless steel ring mounted in the tip of the tube inner diameters, length, and all other dimensions of both tubes were confirmed within the spec.The ring removed out of the ring was not returned (lost somewhere in the clinic).The device history record (dhr) of the lacrifast with lot no.Kp094404 was reviewed with no nonconformity or abnormality was found in its mfg processes.The device met its material, assembling and prod spec.As a possible cause of the penetration of the bougie and dropping off the ring during the use, we speculate as follows: when the dr tried to insert and advance the tube with the bougie inserted forcibly in the heavily occluded lesion, excessive mechanical force was loaded on the ring and the distal tip of the tube were the ring was mounted, and further pushing the bougie resulted in dismounting the ring and penetration of the ring out of the tube.
|