• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT- SZ 4- 9MM; COMPARTMENTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT- SZ 4- 9MM; COMPARTMENTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180704-2
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/19/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A patient had received a partial knee arthroplasty, which was performed using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio) and restoris multicompartmental knee (mck) implants.Approximately one month later, the patient presented with signs of a possible infection, and the surgeon performed an incision and drainage (i&d) procedure and exchanged the tibial onlay insert component.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted if additional information becomes available.Device not returned; discarded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding infection involving a restoris mck insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Device evaluation could not be performed as the subject device was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: a complaint history review was not performed as no device specific failure modes were identified.Conclusions: infection is most likely a result from other factors not necessarily related to the device in the healthcare facility setting, however, the event could not be confirmed nor the root cause determined due to the minimal information received.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time as no devices and insufficient information was received by stryker orthopaedics.If devices and / or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
A patient had received a partial knee arthroplasty, which was performed using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio) and restoris multicompartmental knee (mck) implants.Approximately one month later, the patient presented with signs of a possible infection, and the surgeon performed an incision and drainage (i&d) procedure and exchanged the tibial onlay insert component.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT- SZ 4- 9MM
Type of Device
COMPARTMENTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
keyla colon
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4538105
MDR Text Key20785195
Report Number3005985723-2015-00016
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/19/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/24/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number180704-2
Device Lot Number12020611-3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-