• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MENISCAL APPLIER, OMNISPAN; ACL MENISCAL IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MENISCAL APPLIER, OMNISPAN; ACL MENISCAL IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 228143
Device Problem Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204)
Patient Problem Unknown (for use when the patient's condition is not known) (2202)
Event Date 02/10/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Backstop couldn't release by both applicators and all 3 needles.Instrument was inhibited.In this case the already release backstop must be removed.The surgeon must also remove a part of the meniscal.Surgery outcome was a partial meniscectomy instead repair.See associated medwatch # 1221934-2015-00639.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy mitek however it is not known if it will be received within the 30 day reporting requirement, therefore depuy mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is a follow up report to document device return.A final report will be filed once the device has been investigated.
 
Event Description
Backstop couldn't release by both applicators and all 3 needles.Instrument was inhibited.In this case the already release backstop must be removed.The surgeon must also remove a part of the meniscal.Surgery outcome was a partial meniscectomy instead repair.See associated medwatch # 1221934-2015-00639.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was received by depuy synthes mitek and functional testing revealed the red trigger on the device was sticking and would not return to the ¿home¿ position.A batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed one other similar complaint for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.The complaint device was forwarded to the manufacturer for evaluation and root cause analysis.The manufacturer¿s investigation confirmed the trigger on the device would not fully return without assistance, confirming the complaint.The manufacturer confirmed that this product is 100% functionally activated by the assembly operator including trigger activation before packaging.During the complaint investigation attempts to simulate this failure mode were made, it appears that the gear assembly associated with the trigger might have been misaligned, not fully seated, and then slipped back into alignment but at a different gear location.Once moving freely the loading rod was visually short in deployed length indicating the gear which governs deployment length is out of location.The length was dimensionally verified to be short.It is possible that during assembly, the gear tooth was not fully seated, however it cannot be confirmed.An attempt at confirming this was made via a non-destructive test, a ct scan, which was performed on the device however the results were inconclusive.The manufacturer believes this device failure is an anomaly.The manufacturer has opened a capa as a result of this failure.No further action is warranted at this time, however, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
Backstop couldn't release by both applicators and all 3 needles.Instrument was inhibited.In this case the already release backstop must be removed.The surgeon must also remove a part of the meniscal.Surgery outcome was a partial meniscectomy instead repair.See associated medwatch # 1221934-2015-00639.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MENISCAL APPLIER, OMNISPAN
Type of Device
ACL MENISCAL IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
david primmerman
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key4560671
MDR Text Key20018186
Report Number1221934-2015-00638
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2017
Device Catalogue Number228143
Device Lot Number3795862
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/04/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/10/2015
Device Age5 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/10/2015
Date Manufacturer Received02/10/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/05/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-