• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problem Cut In Material (2454)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 02/06/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was initially reported that during a morning check-off, the head restraint wire of the autopulse platform was found to be cut.No patient involvement was reported.No further information was provided.The autopulse platform was subsequently returned to zoll for investigation.During investigation, the autopulse platform displayed a user advisory (ua) 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) message.Although the customer did not report this, ua 7 is considered a reportable malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform in complaint was returned to zoll on 01/22/2015 for investigation.Investigation results as follows: the platform was visually inspected for external damages.The initial reported complaint of the head restraint wires being cut was confirmed; the wires were found to have been damaged.Unrelated to the initial reported complaint, the device's lcd was found to not be functioning properly with some of the pixels missing.In addition, a damaged ir port on the processor pca board was observed.When the platform was powered on during functional testing, it displayed a user advisory (ua) 7 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large).Load cell characterization was performed and found load cell module 2 to be over-reporting and causing the observed ua 7 advisory code.Following replacement of load cell module 2, the device passed functional test requirements.The platform's archive data was reviewed.There were no ua codes observed on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2015.There were; however, multiple ua 7 codes identified on other dates.The cause of the ua 7 codes was previously identified as load cell 2 over-reporting.Based on the investigation, the part(s) identified for replacement were the top cover, lcd, pca and load cell module.In summary, the initial reported complaint of the head restraint wires being damaged was confirmed during visual inspection.Unrelated to the initial reported complaint, ua 7 was observed during power on of the platform as well as in the platform's archive.The ua 7 fault was attributed to load cell module 2 over-reporting.Following service, including replacement of the damaged parts, the device passed all testing criteria.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION SYSTEM MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key4564248
MDR Text Key5474333
Report Number3010617000-2015-00138
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/03/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Service and Testing Personnel
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0700-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/22/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/23/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-