• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS CER BIOLOXD OPTION HEAD 28MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS CER BIOLOXD OPTION HEAD 28MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Metal Shedding Debris (1804)
Patient Problems Inflammation (1932); Damage to Ligament(s) (1952); Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Swelling (2091); Tissue Damage (2104); Toxicity (2333); Reaction (2414); Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint (2671); Test Result (2695)
Event Date 04/11/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Legal counsel patient reported that patient underwent an initial left hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2006.Patient's legal counsel further reported patient allegations of pain, swelling, inflammation, damage to surrounding tissue and bone, lack of mobility, metallosis, metal poisoning, and loss of range of motion.Legal counsel alleged a revision procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2013 where the modular head and insert were removed and replaced.Legal counsel further alleged that a second revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2013 where the cup and insert were removed and replaced.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff¿s complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.Additional information received from invoice history indicates that the modular head and taper adapter were removed and replaced with an active articulation liner and head during the revision procedure on (b)(6) 2013.Invoice history further suggests the acetabular cup, liner and head were replaced with competitor acetabular components and a biomet ceramic head on (b)(6) 2013.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Review of device history records show that lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: "inadequate range of motion due to improper selection or positioning of components." and "intraoperative or postoperative bone fracture and/or postoperative pain." this report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff¿s complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.This report is number 3 of 3 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2015-00734 & 00735 & 01170).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.
 
Event Description
Legal counsel patient reported that patient underwent an initial left hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2006.Patient's legal counsel further reported patient allegations of pain, swelling, inflammation, damage to surrounding tissue and bone, lack of mobility, metallosis, metal poisoning, and loss of range of motion.Legal counsel alleged a revision procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2013 where the modular head and insert were removed and replaced.Legal counsel further alleged that a second revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2013 where the cup and insert were removed and replaced.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff's complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.Additional information received from invoice history indicates that the modular head and taper adapter were removed and replaced with an active articulation liner and head during the revision procedure on (b)(6) 2013.Invoice history further suggests the acetabular cup, liner and head were replaced with competitor acetabular components and a biomet ceramic head on (b)(6) 2013.Additional information received in operative report noted patient was revised on (b)(6) 2013 due to metallosis, implant clicking and locking, and trochanteric bursitis.Operative report further noted a reactive capsule and fluid during the procedure.The modular head and taper adapter were removed and replaced and a liner was implanted.Operative report noted patient underwent a further revision procedure on (b)(6) 2013 due to recurrent dislocation and pain.During the procedure, a hematoma was noted.The modular head, acetabular cup and liner were removed and replaced with a biomet head and competitor acetabular components.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CER BIOLOXD OPTION HEAD 28MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key4637517
MDR Text Key5612774
Report Number0001825034-2015-01170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK082996
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2022
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number650-1055
Device Lot Number316130
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/15/2015
Initial Date FDA Received03/27/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/09/2015
04/29/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/20/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-