It was reported that there was a left brain stroke at implant.The patient was unable to speak and had limited movement of the right arm and leg.The patient had been doing in-patient rehab from (b)(6) 2014.The patient had gone home for (b)(6) and had been doing day rehab since then monday through friday 9am to 3pm.The patient¿s father inquired if the patient could have ¿e-stim.¿ the rehab used it to stimulate the muscles in the patient¿s right arm and leg to try and regain some movement and ability.The patient¿s deep brain stimulator was implanted near the left collarbone.They did not think the stimulation was used on the patient¿s right shoulder.The deep brain stimulator had been turned on within the last two weeks prior to the date of this report.It was unknown if the stroke was related to the surgery, at the time they had not been sure that it was a stroke or if it had possibly been some swelling that came with that type of a procedure.The procedure was done on a monday and on tuesday or w ednesday of the same week they had done an mri to see what was happening and at that time there was nothing definitive.It was noted that the way the leads were implanted were possibly obstructing the view.The father¿s impression was that they could not really tell what had happened because they could not see.In 2014 prior to implant the patient¿s disease had started to change and due to the changes within that last year they had decided to go ahead and try the implant.The patient was on a ton of medication and was now almost of all of the medications.The patient was moving better than she had in a long time.When the patient had come out of the procedure she was unable to speak or move her right side.The patient was now able to speak, her voice was a lot fainter than before but was able to speak.The patient really did not use the wheelchair at all now, she walked kind of slow and was unable to walk distances.It was noted that prior to the implant the patient was in a wheelchair.They were in the process of slowly adjust ing the deep brain stimulator at the time of this report.The patient¿s father was concerned because he was informed to not allow the therapist to use any therapeutic ultrasound on the patient and he had remembered the patient had diagnostic ultrasounds when she was in the hospital recovering from the stroke.The patient had a urinary tract infection (uti) in december prior to the date of this report while in the hospital.Because of the catheter they were monitoring the patient¿s bladder and doing ultrasounds pretty much every time she eliminated they wanted to scan her bladder.No outcome was provided.Further follow-up is being conducted to obtain this information.If additional information is received a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
Concomitant medical products: product id 3389s-40, lot# va0nz7t, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead; product id 3389s-40, lot# va0nesh, implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: lead; product id 3708660, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: extension; product id 3708660, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2014, product type: extension.(b)(4).(b)(6).
|