• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TARGET DEVICE GAMMA3® 300X160MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TARGET DEVICE GAMMA3® 300X160MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 13200100
Device Problems Crack (1135); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/10/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It is reported by male nurse of the hospital, that there was a missdrilling during the distal locking.Target device got a crack.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation revealed the target device as primary product.Concomitant products were not reported.Appearance of item and inspection records identified the target device returned being of old design version.Deviations in the inspection documents were not found.A check of the function on 100% of the devices (sub-supplier) and additional in-house spot check of the lot in question revealed function was given in full on the devices at the stage of delivery.Functional test revealed neither proximal ¿ nor distal contacts of the drill to the drill holes of the sample nail.The function of the target device returned was still given although significant impacts and cracks as well as a small gap causing slight wobbling between targeting arm and nail adapter were found in the cfr-material.The alleged distal targeting issue could not be reproduced.Potentially reduced accuracy in guidance is usually found during functional check (required per ifu).In case of any deviation it is realized prior to use.Pre-supposing that targeting accuracy for drilling was confirmed by pre-operative check it was concluded that the alleged event(s) were mainly based in the intra-operative procedure.The target device returned was documented as faultless prior to distribution and as it had been in use for a longer time (more than 9 years) we pre-suppose that this target device had fulfilled its tasks in former surgeries as intended.Reasons for misaligned drilling and misaligned distal locking screws are various.Potential miss-targeting can also be caused but is not limited by e.G.Ensure that the nail holding bolt is still fully tightened.Avoid soft tissue pressure on the distal locking sleeve assembly- therefore the skin incision would be made (co-linear) in direction of the sleeve assembly.Check that the distal locking sleeve assembly with the trocar removed is in contact with the lateral cortex of the femur and is locked securely with the speedlock sleeve knob.Confirm final locking screw placement with a/p and lateral fluoroscopic x-ray.Neutralize the power tool weight during drilling procedure and do not apply force to the targeting arm.Start the power tool before having bone contact with the drill.Use sharp and center tipped drills only.Regarding misdrilling the operative technique has already been modified by (b)(4).Although a real root cause could not be determined the alleged event is most likely caused due to a suboptimal intra-operative procedure.Collateral findings: it could be assumed that the cracks found are the result of internal material stresses enforced by multiple sterilization- and cleaning processes over the years of being in use.Internal lab test report (b)(4) revealed that deviation due to cracks does not lead to increased damages at the nail.This indicates that the interlaminar crack do not influence the targeting performance critically.Referring to compiled hat (b)(4) it was concluded that no action in the market should be performed.The brochure instructions for cleaning, sterilization, inspection and maintenance (b)(4) shows several examples of damages and recommends removing such damaged products.With engineering change notice ecn (b)(4) the material of the cfr-arm has already been changed in order to improve stiffness and avoid cracking.Lab test (b)(4) had verified the suitability of the new material.The significant impacts found at the metal nail adapter and at the lower curved part of the target device are due to hammering onto the device which is regarded as rough handling and thus user related.The above noticed significant impacts, cracks and gap are clearly visible and should have been noticed already during required checking of the instruments which is required by the ifu prior surgery.
 
Event Description
It is reported by male nurse of the hospital, that there was a missdrilling during the distal locking.Target device got a crack.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TARGET DEVICE GAMMA3® 300X160MM
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-24 232
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-24 232
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4649349
MDR Text Key15914050
Report Number0009610622-2015-00141
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K123401
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/01/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number13200100
Device Lot NumberKP236075
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/23/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/22/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-