It was reported that a distractor on a mandible doesn't seem to be distracting at the same rate.Parents of the patient say that they distracted it and it feels like it distracted but that it's regressed back.During a follow up visit on (b)(6) 2015, it was noted that the distractor was working fine.At some point later, the surgeon thinks that there is potentially a functional issue with distractor.The exact functional issue is unknown.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
Event date: unknown.Implant date: unknown.Device has not been reported as explanted without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|