• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number WCD 4000
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Reset Problem (3019)
Patient Problems Lethargy (2560); Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
Event Date 06/14/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
A retroactive review of patient flag files in the lifevest network identified a monitor reset following a treatment on (b)(6) 2013.The patient reported that he was treated.The patient remembered being weak following dialysis treatment.After the retrospective review of the patient's flag files, it was revealed that the patient received one inappropriate treatment at 15:38:52 on (b)(6) 2013.After the treatment was delivered, the monitor reset.The rhythm at the time of treatment was a paced rhythm at 60 bpm.The post-shock rhythm was a paced rhythm at 60 bpm.The patient was taken to the hospital and continued to wear the lifevest.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient was taken to the hospital and continued to wear the lifevest.Device evaluation summary: device evaluation of belt sn (b)(4) has been completed.The belt was returned on 06/15/2013.Upon investigation, the electrode belt was fully functional.Device evaluation of monitor sn (b)(4) was completed.The monitor was returned as normal maintenance on 09/04/2013 and found to be fully functional.Zoll was unaware of the treatment and reset that occurred at that time.Monitor sn (b)(4) reset after a treatment was delivered.An investigation into monitors exhibiting the same issue found that the root cause for the reset is noise from the defibrillator pca high-voltage capacitors propagating on the main battery wire on the monitor c/a board.A real-time review request for a design change to address this issue was submitted to fda on 01/20/2015.No adverse event resulted from the pulse reset.Device manufacture date: monitor sn (b)(4): (b)(6) 2013 - initial use.Electrode belt sn (b)(4): (b)(6) 2013 - initial use.Inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.(b)(4).A summary of the safety and effectiveness date (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010030b.Pdf.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Type of Device
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
pittsburgh PA 15238 349
Manufacturer Contact
nina rudolph
121 gamma dr
pittsburgh, PA 15238-3495
4129683333
MDR Report Key4673034
MDR Text Key5607574
Report Number3008642652-2015-01771
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010030
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/31/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/07/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberWCD 4000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/13/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-