Catalog Number 487.963 |
Device Problems
Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problems
Sedation (2368); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/05/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this complaint is for the first surgery dated (b)(6) 2015 the distractors placement was very complicated and after many hours of trying to place it, the distractors were derailed from the backplate.Surgical delay: many hours (exact time unknown).This report is 2 of 6 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.No patient information reported.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.The manufacturing location for part # 487.963 / lot # 6879052 is (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Update (based on operating room notes received on (b)(6) 2015): it was reported that the surgeon(s) placed vertical distractors in the bilateral mandibular ramus and performed an upper-level osteotomy on the mandibular tongue (per described technique).At the 24-hour follow-up, a panoramic radiograph confirmed left-side displacement and early signs of right-side displacement.Two revision procedures were performed thereafter (and addressed in com-(b)(4) and com-(b)(4)).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The first revision procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2015.At this time, the devices were repositioned, but not removed.The actual explant was scheduled for (b)(6) 2015, but may not have occurred until (b)(6) 2015.Therefore, the exact date of explant is unknown.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A manufacturing investigation action was conducted/performed.The report indicates that the: the out of tolerance parallelism condition of the flat of the slip fastener component p/n 487.962.2 with the flat of the locking distal foot component p/n 487.963.1, along with the lack of radii at the upper r5 corners and oversized r6 corner radii of the slip fastener component may have created potential for the complaint condition reported as does not/will not function, will not hold.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
During the first surgery, the surgeon inserted vertical distractors in bilateral mandibular branch.The surgery lasted two (2) hours.This is report 2 of 14 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional manufacturing dates for this device include: july 27, 2012, july 13, 2013, december 9, 2013, march 5, 2014, and november 4, 2014.Device history review: device history records (dhr) for the reported product lot indicates that the lot was produced on july 10, 2012.Dhr for the reported fully assembled product lot and sub-components show that ((b)(4)) non-conformance report (ncr) was initiated in response to minor documentation non-conformities detected during final inspection of the product lot.The ncr indicates that the detected documentation non-conformities were corrected and the lot dispositioned as ¿conforms¿ since inspection records for the lot indicate that the product met all established dimensional, functional, and visual requirements for release.A review of the dhr for the reported lot found no objective evidence indicating that the manufacturing of the reported lot or the reported documentation nonconformities contributed to the complaint condition reported as does not/will not function : will not hold.The dhr for the reported product lot also indicates that the lot was repackaged and relabeled on july 27, 2012 ((b)(4) pieces), july 13, 2013 ((b)(4) pieces), december 9, 2013 ((b)(4) piece), march 5, 2014 ((b)(4) piece), and november 4, 2014 ((b)(4) pieces).However, there is no objective evidence that the reported repackaging and re-labeling contributed to the complaint condition reported as does not/will not function : will not hold.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
This report is 2 of 7 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|