• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1000 MED-EL CONCERT
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Vibration (1674); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Headache (1880); Pain (1994); Burning Sensation (2146)
Event Date 03/10/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a 1.5t mri of her back during which the patient experienced burning and pain.Reportedly, prior to the scan the mri center contacted the patient's audiologist and she referred them to med-el and the implanted surgeon.The patient could not tolerate imaging due to feeling of pain, vibration and electrical shock.The patient now reports that she feels vibrations with the placement of the rondo audio processor on her head with no stimulation.The patient also reports not feeling the vibration with the opus 2 audio processor but once it is turned on, she felt electrical shocks and removed it.Further testing is scheduled for (b)(6) 2015.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it is to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Conclusions: based received information, the observed symptoms were not caused by the cochlear implant but rather by a too tight headband, applied before the mri, which might have exerted pressure on the occipital nerve.Once the pain was treated by the implanting surgeon, the patient rapidly regained benefit from the device.No further problems were observed.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a 1.5t mri of her back during which the patient experienced burning and pain.Reportedly, prior to the scan the mri center contacted the patient's audiologist and she referred them to med-el and the implanted surgeon.The patient could not tolerate imaging due to feeling of pain, vibration and electrical shock.The patient now reports that she feels vibrations with the placement of the rondo audio processor on her head with no stimulation.The patient also reports not feeling the vibration with the opus 2 audio processor but once it is turned on, she felt electrical shocks and removed it.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key4688031
MDR Text Key19644769
Report Number9710014-2015-00271
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/03/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/13/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMI1000 MED-EL CONCERT
Other Device ID Number(01) 09008737062743 (
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age28 YR
-
-