Evaluation summary.A clinical analyst reviewed this complaint and stated the following: corneal thermal injuries are typically related to excessive heat generated by the phaco tip due to insufficient aspiration flow, extended energy application, or combination of both.The system is designed to cool the phaco tip during use as aspirated fluid flows through the tip lumen.Overheating of the phaco tip, however, may occur due to extended application of ultrasonic energy or compromised aspiration flow through the phaco tip.Reduced fluid flow through the phaco tip may be caused by phaco tip re-use, tip clogging by nuclear material, kinked tubing, inadequate flow and vacuum settings, or obstruction by ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd).When the phaco tip is occluded, infusion will cease, reducing the cooling effect of the tip.Occlusion tones (intermittent beeping tones during occlusion) alert the user, indicating that the vacuum is near or at its preset limit, and aspiration flow is reduced or stopped.The surgeon must recognize the occlusion tones and manually stop the ultrasound mode in order to prevent a rapid temperature increase.A company service representative examined the system.The system was tested and confirmed to function as intended.The system was then tested and met all product specifications.The product met specifications at the time of release.The associated handpiece (hp) was returned for evaluation.Both visual and functional testing found the handpiece to meet specifications.The ground resistance was found to meet specifications.The hp was then connected to a calibrated system and primed and tuned without any nonconformities.The hp was run at 100% power for 5 minutes and no abnormalities were observed.Finally, u/s and torsional stroke was measured and was verified to meet specifications.For the custom pak the device history record (dhr) was review and did not show any abnormalities.Also no remarks were made during the manufacturing process of this lot.The sterilization cycle was checked for this specific custom pak lot and no abnormalities were reported.No complaint sample was received.For the consumable product the review of the dhr indicates the order was built to specification.The customer did not retain a sample for this complaint report; visual inspection or functional testing could not be conducted.Corneal burn is an issue that is occasionally reported with cataract surgery.According to the pennsylvania patient safety advisory abstract: preventing corneal burns during phacoemulsification, march 2010, vol.7, no.1: 23-25, most corneal burns can be traced to issues related to surgical technique and not to malfunctioning equipment.A root cause cannot be determined.The handpiece sample was found to meet specifications; therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.For the custom pak and the consumable products no sample was received and the root cause could not be determined.(b)(4).
|