• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC SURFACE APPLICATOR SET WITH LEIPZIG-STYLE CONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC SURFACE APPLICATOR SET WITH LEIPZIG-STYLE CONE Back to Search Results
Model Number GM11010800
Device Problem Labelling, Instructions for Use or Training Problem (1318)
Patient Problem Radiation Overdose (1510)
Event Date 03/26/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Varian has discovered that there is a discrepancy in the absolute dose rate given with the leipzig-style surface applicator's instruction for use (ifu): dose characterization gm11010080 (b)(6) 2012.This issue was discovered by a customer during commissioning of the leipzig-style surface applicators using thermo luminescent dosimeters (tld).The customer found 24% discrepancy in their tld-measured dose as compared to the varian ifu.The most significant discrepancy is that the actual dose rate of the applicator is approximately 14% higher than the rate published within the ifu.Use of the dose rate within the ifu without independent confirmation of the dose could result in an adminstration of the dose greater than intended.The patient's treatment was prescribed for 400cgy per fraction x 8 fractions, to a depth of 3mm.The dose rate used to plan the treatment dwell time was the dose rate given in the ifu of 21.5 cgy/min/ci (at 5mm).This would result in an overdose of 14% (456cgy per fraction).The site is anticipating making dosimetric adjustments to the final fractions.Per varian's medical professional assessment, the pt has most likely been unharmed by the overdose and would not experience a serious injury as the overdose from the 3 fractions treated results in a low risk for skin/tissue necrosis and could be further mitigated by reducing the daily fraction dose.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The issue was investigated by varian.A review of the following was carried out: the applicator ifu, data given to varian from (b)(4) as part of the (b)(4) ((b)(4) was contracted to perform characterizations of the applicators to provide data for the ifu), (b)(4) ref guide, the tld data from the clinical site, as well as a report generated by (b)(4) in 2013.The discrepancy between the dose rate published in the applicator's ifu and the dose rate from corrected (b)(4), and physical measurement was verified.The root cause was validation and verification error; a failure for (b)(4) and varian to come together and review all deliverables together at the end of the characterization project.The ifu will be updated with corrected dose rates.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURFACE APPLICATOR SET WITH LEIPZIG-STYLE CONE
Type of Device
SURFACE APPLICATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC
3100 hansen way
palo alto CA 94304
Manufacturer (Section G)
VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS HAAN GMBH
bergische strasse 16
Manufacturer Contact
rachel forsberg, ra.qa, mgr
501 locust ave
ste 1
charlottesville, VA 22902
4349518635
MDR Report Key4731343
MDR Text Key15317992
Report Number9612638-2015-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JAQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K123815
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/26/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/24/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGM11010800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/26/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-