• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA TI MATRIX LOCKING CAP; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA TI MATRIX LOCKING CAP; ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04.632.000
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Vascular System (Circulation), Impaired (2572); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the tulip popped off of the matrix screw.On (b)(6) 2014 the surgeon performed a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) from a mini open incision on the left posterior side.The levels involved were l4-l5.The surgeon implanted a vertebral spacer tr, 10x30x10mm and used four 6.0mm titanium cannulated matrix polyaxial screws, four titanium matrix locking caps, and two 5.5mm titanium curved rods 35mm.During the one month post-op follow-up visit, the surgeon took x-rays, date unknown.The surgeon noticed the head of one screw came off and the spacer has migrated.The surgeon decided to leave the devices implanted and monitor it.The patient status was listed as neurologically intact.There was no reported complaint of pain, nor any other pathological issues reported.On (b)(6) 2014, the patient went for a post-operative visit.The patient did not have leg pain at that time.X-rays taken during the post-operative visit showed a disconnection between the two head and the screw, a pedical screw was fractured and the cage had backed out.At that point, the surgeon decided to monitor the patient and not proceed with a revision procedure.On (b)(6) 2014, the patient went for another post-operative visit.She had started to experience lower back pain and right hip pain with occasional tingling in the right leg.At this point the surgeon decided to proceed with a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2014.It was reported that the patient underwent a procedure on (b)(6) 2014.The procedure performed was an exploration of l4-5 fusion area with removal and reinsertion of instrumentation, decompression of nerve root and removal of old inter-body graft fusion, both inter-body and posterolateral with inter-body device and allograft mixed with bone marrow aspiration.The l4 screw head and nut was disconnected and the rod was removed.This allowed for exposure of the broken l5 screw with the head still visible.The cage was identified lateral to the interspace and had backed out.Loose fragments of the old bone graft were removed.The patient was implanted with one screw, one spacer, one rod, two locking caps, chronos granules and putty.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2014 and it was noted that the patient had immediate improvement in her right leg pain, improvement in her lower back pain and was able to ambulate without difficulty.There was no delay in surgery and it was reported that the patient recovering with no additional harm.In (b)(6) 2015, it was reported that the patient is currently experiencing leg and circulation problems.It was reported that she will have an unknown shot on (b)(6) 2015 to treat this.It was reported that the patient is still in pain; every step she takes hurts.The patient had another unknown shot in her leg on (b)(6) 2015.This is report 13 of 13 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Additional product codes: mnh, mni, kwq, kwp.Device has not been reported as explanted.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Date of this report/ date received by manufacture reported as april 14, 2014; should be april 14, 2015.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TI MATRIX LOCKING CAP
Type of Device
ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION, FOR DDD
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4733706
MDR Text Key5739040
Report Number2520274-2015-13464
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK100952
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04.632.000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/29/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight86
-
-