• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: B.BRAUN 20 GAUGE CLOSED TIP POLYMIDE NYLON CATHETER; EPIDURAL CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

B.BRAUN 20 GAUGE CLOSED TIP POLYMIDE NYLON CATHETER; EPIDURAL CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 551370
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Device, or device fragments remain in patient (1527); Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problem Nonresorbable materials, unretrieved in body (2276)
Event Date 12/24/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
(b)(6) female entered operating room for rthr (right total hip replacement) revision.Spinal epidural was attempted at level l4-5, then at level l5-s1; appropriate space could not be found.For a third attempt, which was successful, a new epidural needle was utilized at the l3-4 interspace.After obtaining loss of resistance at this level, a 27g whitacre needle was inserted and csf (cerebral spinal fluid) was obtained.The anesthesiologist then gave the intrathecal dose of local anesthetic, the spinal needle was removed and an epidural catheter was threaded through the epidural needle.The anesthesiologist was able to thread the catheter 20cm with no resistance or problem.The epidural needle was then removed without any problem.Subsequently, the anesthesiologist attempted to pull back the catheter to the desired length; the plan was to pull it back to 15cm at the skin, as loss of resistance was obtained at 9cm.She was able to pull back approximately 4cm, then met resistance in the catheter.She then found that the catheter had broken.Upon removal, it was noted that approximately 10 cm of epidural catheter had remained in the patient, based on surface anatomy, in the epidural space or subcutaneous tissue of l3-4.Throughout the process, the patient was awake, slightly sedated and comfortable.Her vital signs were stable and she reported no pain or discomfort.Surgery was uneventful.The anesthesiologist saw the patient post-operatively; the patient had no neurologic deficits, nor signs of infection.The anesthesiologist held three lengthy discussions with the patient and family, first post-operatively, then on pod (post operative day) #1, and pod#2 regarding the occurrence and retained catheter.Examination revealed no visible fragment nor tract in the patient's back.In accordance with standard of care, the patient was advised to contact the anesthesiologist and/or primary physician immediately for evaluation in the event of any signs/symptoms of infection or neurologic deficit.The patient and family fully understood, and all questions were answered.The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility on (b)(6) 2014.The plan, if no issue arises prior, was for her post-operative visit to the surgeon at 4-6 weeks post-operatively.The patient did not report any issues and saw the surgeon for her post-operative visit on (b)(6) 2015, at which time she was doing very well with her recovery.There were no issues with the catheter fragment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
20 GAUGE CLOSED TIP POLYMIDE NYLON CATHETER
Type of Device
EPIDURAL CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
B.BRAUN
bethelehem PA 18011
MDR Report Key4738913
MDR Text Key5703134
Report Number4738913
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAZ
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number551370
Other Device ID NumberITEM 333540
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/24/2014
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/10/2015
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient Weight96
-
-