• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENICON MEDIUM SPECIMEN RETRIEVAL BAG, 100MMX150; CONTAINER, SPECIMEN, STERILE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENICON MEDIUM SPECIMEN RETRIEVAL BAG, 100MMX150; CONTAINER, SPECIMEN, STERILE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 550-000-003
Device Problems Unraveled Material (1664); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/21/2010
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
When the item was inserted into the pt, surgeon went to deploy the bag.He said the bag "fell apart" upon deployment.Material's manager, was then called into case and replaced the defective bag with a new one.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation findings: the product is a vendor supplied product.The qfi report review identified sales info, and for similar reports.Deroyal has sold (b)(4) cases of the finished good from 2011 to 2013.No similar reports were found for the product, "falling apart upon deployment".During the course of the investigation (b)(4) supplied a performance eval of the product.An initial scar response was provided, on 04/03/2013, indicating the investigation is ongoing.The vendor has been identified as (b)(4).(b)(4) was issued to the vendor on 08/26/2013.Follow ups were performed on 09/04/2013; on 09/10/2013; on 09/12/2013; and the updated response was received on 09/16/2013.Within the vendor's response it is indicated that, "the new revisions will be tested using the same test format as (b)(4) to ensure that the change has been implemented correctly.Added 09/16/2013 - (b)(4) is still in the verification phase as we are still testing the new style bag to our quality standards but mr.(b)(4) has confirmed via email that the new bag has met all outstanding complaints.Correction: as per the customer's request a replacement was shipped on order# (b)(4).Root cause analysis: (b)(4): the root cause appears to be along the seam of the pouch where it is possible that the heat sealer is not properly sealing the pouch.The cause for the heart sealer failure has not been determined yet.Added 09/16/2013- the decision was made to source a pouch that was made of a different material that provided a stronger seal than our current product.The new material is also impermeable.(b)(4) was able to see the new style bag at a diagnostic lab on 09/11/2013.The new pouch is now stitched to ensure there can be no heat sealer issue.Corrective action and/or systemic correction action taken: (b)(4): ongoing- we are investigating the heat sealer and hydrophobic coating.A rep from the coating supplier is meeting with our cto next week to discuss options.If you hypothesis is correct, we will adjust the hydrophobic coating and the issue will no longer occur.This will not affect the shelf life of the product and all tests that are required will be completed.Added 09/16/2013- after extensive review a different material and pouch were developed.(b)(4) (deroyal) was able to evaluate the bag and provide this info, "the product is not impermeable, and the stitching or weld is being reinforced but is acceptable in the field." preventive action: (b)(4): added 09/16/2013- (b)(4) held a diagnostic lab prior to releasing the new product that allowed multiple companies to use the product and provide feedback.We will also provide, along with the help of our distributors, more hand on in-service and follow-up to ensure proper use of the product.This report is being filed due to a retrospective review of complaints.This complaint has been re-opened for further investigation.A supplemental report will be filed if further investigation provides info which changes the content of this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDIUM SPECIMEN RETRIEVAL BAG, 100MMX150
Type of Device
CONTAINER, SPECIMEN, STERILE
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENICON
6869 stapoint st
ste 114
winter park FL 32792
Manufacturer Contact
200 debusk ln
powell, TN 37849
8653622333
MDR Report Key4749212
MDR Text Key5771849
Report Number1060680-2015-00018
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/04/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number550-000-003
Device Lot Number1304QDA403 INCORRECT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date08/21/2013
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received08/21/2013
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberTBD
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-