• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA RADIFOCUS OPTITORQUE ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA RADIFOCUS OPTITORQUE ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 04/09/2015
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
The user facility reported an aorta perforation using the radifocus optitorqus device.Follow up communication with the user facility reported the following information: the liver biopsy resulted in intraperitoneal bleeding; to arrest hemorrhage emergency angiography was performed; (3) however, the patient expired; and it was reported bleeding may have become worse due perforation of the aorta.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This section was completed by the manufacturer per cfr 803.52(f) (11) because the information was not initially completed by the user facility.This one reported event is being reported on the following mdr reports: 9681834-2015-00081, 9681834-2015-00082, 9681834-2015-00083 and 9681834-2015-00085.The actual sample was not returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation and the lot number is unknown.Therefore, the investigation was based on the evaluation of user facility information, and the evaluation of a product sample.Visual inspection did not find any anomalies.Visual inspection of the shaped segment did not reveal any anomalies.Magnifying inspection of the distal end confirmed that the chamfering and rounding processing had been done correctly.Electron microscopic inspection of the distal segment did not find any anomaly.The inside and outside diameters were measured on the distal segment and confirmed to meet manufacturer specifications.The kink resistance was determined and confirmed to be normal.The production lot number was not provided by the user facility, which prevented a meaningful review of the device history record and the shipping inspection record.A review of the complaint files were conducted back two years (from may, 2013 to april, 2015) and found no reports of perforation of the aorta.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The investigation results verified the samples evaluated were of the normal product.With no return of the actual sample to evaluate, the cause of the reported perforation of the vessel cannot be determined from the available information.The potential for such an event is addressed in the warnings / precautions section of the instructions-for-use by statements such as the following: never advance or withdraw an intraluminal device against resistance until the cause of resistance is determined by fluoroscopy.Failure to exercise proper caution may result in damage to the vessel or catheter.Separation of the catheter may occur requiring retrieval in some cases.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.(b)(4).Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RADIFOCUS OPTITORQUE ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
cathleen hargreaves
950 elkton blvd.
elkton, MD 21921
8002837866
MDR Report Key4765244
MDR Text Key5786154
Report Number9681834-2015-00084
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/21/2015,05/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/12/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberRH-AG94007
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/09/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer04/21/2015
Date Manufacturer Received04/21/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-