• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS PMTA ACCU2I INTERMEDIATE APPLICATOR; MICROWAVE APPLICATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS PMTA ACCU2I INTERMEDIATE APPLICATOR; MICROWAVE APPLICATOR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 900-602
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/17/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported (b)(4) 2015, pt of unk age and gender presented for a microwave procedure.During the procedure, when the treating physician noted the tip of the applicator probe appeared to be bent.There was no report of pt harm or injury due to the events.It was reported the disposable device is not available for return tho the mfr was it was disposed of by the user.Angiodynamics is attempting to obtain further details regarding the events and any further medical intervention taken by the treating physician.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the disposable device was discarded by the user and is not available to be returned to the mfr for eval.An investigation into the root cause of this incident is currently in progress.The results of the device eval will be sent via a f/u medwatch.A review of the device history records was performed for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance spec.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Returned for evaluation was one used pmta applicator.Visual examination noted that the tip of the applicator was bent less than 10 degrees.Applicator passed functional testing.The reported complaint description of the tip being bent is confirmed.A definitive root cause for the reported complaint description cannot be determined.Although the exact root cause of the event is unable to be determined, it does not appear to be the result of a manufacturing failure.A possible contributing factor could have been operational context; i.E.Probe placement into hard tissue or lateral forces on the applicator tip during placement or removal.A review of the lot history records was performed for the reported applicator lot any deviation in manufacturing process related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirmed that the lot and the associated components used within the lot all conformed to manufacturing processes and testing.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PMTA ACCU2I INTERMEDIATE APPLICATOR
Type of Device
MICROWAVE APPLICATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS
queensbury NY
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS
603 queensbury ave.
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
dan anderson
603 queensbury ave.
queensbury, NY 12804
5187981215
MDR Report Key4766169
MDR Text Key5950933
Report Number1319211-2015-00263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NEY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
K122762
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/08/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2015
Device Catalogue Number900-602
Device Lot Number14400310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/19/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/15/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-