Pentax medical received a report on (b)(6) 2015 stating that the suction valve popped out of the suction cylinder during irrigation using a 10ml syringe on the biopsy port.Emails were sent to (b)(4), territory manager on (b)(4) 2015 to confirm details surrounding the event.On (b)(6) 2015, confirmation from the territory manager was received stating that the event occurred during procedure, which could lead to possible cross contamination, due to the fluid ejecting from the suction cylinder.The video bronchoscope was evaluated by the pentax service department on (b)(4) 2015 by infusing water, slowly and with force, on the biopsy port using a 10ml syringe.The event was able to be duplicated when force was used to infuse the water.Repairs not related to the reported event were completed, and the video bronchoscope was returned to the customer on (b)(4) 2015.Since there are no relevant repairs to address this concern, a corrective action request will be submitted to the manufacturer to investigate the product malfunction and provide further guidance on how this product malfunction can be prevented from recurring.
|
Due to force being a subjective phenomenon, a corrective action request was initiated on 05/04/2015 and will be submitted to the mfr to investigate the product malfunction.Based on the info received from the initial reporter and the findings by pentax medical, a definitive root cause of the reported event cannot be determined at this time.It is reasonable to suggest that the user introduced the fluid through the syringe with force, which caused the suction valve to pop out of the suction cylinder, as also confirmed by the pentax medical inspector when the video bronchoscope was evaluated.Pentax medical has not received any other info regarding this event or the video bronchoscope involved, and therefore considers this medwatch report closed.
|