• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 625-0T-28D
Device Problems Crack (1135); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 04/22/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that patient had right total hip revised due to failed liner from impingement acetabular insert.The patient presented with pain and was revised.It was noted that a crack in the ceramic liner was observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been requested and if received, will be provided in the supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Patient retained devices.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding wear involving a trident liner and an unknown accolade stem was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: the device was not returned, however images were provided.The insert has an indented wear area on the metallic rim extending into the alumina insert where a metallic transfer is noted on the lip at the site of the metallic wear.A section of the ceramic part of the insert had broken away from the insert.A dimensional and functional inspection was not performed as the device was not returned.A review of the medical information by a clinical consultant indicated that: after seven years in situ, repeated impingement by the neck of the femoral component on the metallic rim of the insert resulted in penetrant wear.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.Device history review and complaint history review could not be performed as the lot id is unknown.Conclusions: a review by a clinical consultant concluded that after seven years in situ, repeated impingement by the neck of the femoral component on the metallic rim of the insert resulted in penetrant wear.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.The exact root cause of the event could not be determined as insufficient information was provided.If additional information such as revision operative reports, x-rays and/or device become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient had right total hip revised due to failed liner from impingement acetabular insert.The patient presented with pain and was revised.It was noted that a crack in the ceramic liner was observed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
Manufacturer Contact
keyla navedo
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4781548
MDR Text Key17204136
Report Number0002249697-2015-01616
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/22/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/19/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number625-0T-28D
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/24/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-