The initial reporter states that the cook catheter did not fail.However, during the procedure, the physician's technique (while using another manufacturer's vessel sealer), melted 5 cm of the catheter, stent placement was needed.Per attached medsun report ((b)(4)): lap exploratory colon resection.The catheter was removed at conclusion of case and was observed to be shorter than preoperatively.An x-ray in the or (operating room) confirmed a segment of the catheter lying with in the mid left ureter.The urologist was called back into the operating room.A cystourethroscopy showed no bladder damage.A small clot, coming from the left ureteral orifice was seen.The urologist encountered at the l5 level of the left ureter, what appeared to be a thermal injury with oozing present at the 11 o'clock to 2 o'clock position extending for 2-3 centimeters.The ureteroscope demonstrated no evidence of a tear.A 6 fr contour stent was passed and in excellent condition within the collection system.The surgeon stated in a brief interview that the other manufacturer's device caused a thermal burn and attributed it to user error and not device failure.The patient was discharged to a rehab facility on op day #7.The catheter and stent were removed via forceps.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|