Batch review performed on (b)(6) 2015.Lot 092226: (b)(6) liners manufactured and released on (b)(6) 2009.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, 29 items of the lot have been already sold without any similar issue reported.On (b)(6) 2015 the medical affairs director made the following analysis: there is no documentation.We do not know which stem was used, it was only referred to us that a non-medacta stem was coupled with the medacta versafit double mobility cup.All medacta stems have a polished neck to reduce the effect of abrasion against a double mobility liner.The geometry of medacta double mobility liners has been designed to match neck angles and so limit point-contact situations.Using a non-medacta product these features are lost and the consequences are unk.It is in fact possible that excessive wear was generated as a consequence of this choice, but we do not have the elements to state so.
|