• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE; PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE; PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Arthritis (1723); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Impaired Healing (2378)
Event Date 02/09/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following journal article: lee, w.T., liu, g., thambiah, j., wong, h.K.(2015).Clinical outcomes of single level lumbar artificial disc replacement compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in an asian population.Singapore medical journal, p1-14.Singapore.This was a review of hospital records for synthes prodisc-l surgeries or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) between 2002 and 2007.The purpose of the study was to examine the clinical outcome of single level artificial disc replacement (adr) compared to tlif for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease (ddd) in asian population.The study population included: a total of 74 patients with 54 (41 males, 13 females) in adr group.Adr group ages ranged 21-55 years old with mean of 34.Surgery levels with adr group were l4/5 (n=21) and l5s1 (n=33).Follow up visits were at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively.Only 38 were included in adr group with 2 year follow-up minimum.Surgical complications were not specified by surgery and therefore will be reported.Complications for prodisc-l: adr 3 ¿ pain free for 6 months, adjacent level pain and revised tlif at l5/s1 and l4/5 posterior decompression at implant level, pain free at last follow-up, facet joint osteoarthritis and scar tissue at l4/5 implant level.[mri].This is report #12 of15 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown prodisc-l polyethylene inlay with an unknown part number, lot number and quantity.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Literature citation: lee, w.T., liu, g., thambiah, j., wong, h.K.(2015).Clinical outcomes of single level lumbar artificial disc replacement compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in an asian population.Singapore medical journal, p1-14.This report is for an unknown prodisc-l polyethylene inlay with unknown part and lot numbers.(b)(6).The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PROSTHESIS INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4787065
MDR Text Key5801604
Report Number2530088-2015-10425
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
PP050010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/21/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/28/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-