Method: visual inspection; functional inspection; device history review; complaint history review; risk assessment; results: inspection of the device revealed beach marks on the fracture surface, which is consistent with fatigue fracture.Per the ifu, these devices are only meant to provide support during fusion and cannot be expected to indefinitely withstand the loads of normal bone.It was stated that fusion was not achieved.Manufacturing records were reviewed for the corresponding lot and no relevant issues were identified conclusion: the most likely cause of the customer reported event is fatigue fracture due to normal loads imposed by the body.
|