Catalog Number 180406 |
Device Problems
Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material (2944); Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975); Packaging Problem (3007)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 04/30/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Dr.(b)(6) was performing an isolated pf procedure.The case proceeded normally through bone preparation.After trailing a size 6l pf component and 35 patella the actual implants were visualized by the surgical team and opened for the circulating nurse.Upon physical evaluation of the size 6 left pf implant, the circulating nurse noted that the implant seemed to have a coating on it.(item number (b)(4) lot 23130911-01).It was noted that the implant did seem to have a film on it.Prior to opening the second ¿inner¿ package of the original implant, we obtained a second implant and opened this implant to the circulating nurse.(item number (b)(4) lot 364360-m) upon visual inspection, the same ¿film¿ or powder was noted on this implant.Having only these two implants, the decision was made to use the original implant (item number (b)(4) lot 26130911-01) to complete the case.Prior to implanting the component was thoroughly washed with a solution of bacitracin and normal saline.After washing the implant was visually inspected for debris and none were noted.The implant was then implanted per standard procedure and the case was completed without further issue.Sales rep provided that surgical delay was 3 minutes.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Review of the device history records indicates the lot was manufactured and accepted into final stock on 18-oct-2011.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.The device was received for evaluation inside the inner sterile blister pack.White particulate debris was observed on the clear plastic of the blister pack and on the surface of the implant.The event was confirmed.The investigation concluded the reported product and issue to be within the scope of legacy mako capa initiated to address debris observed in the inner sterile blister packs of patellofemoral implants.The packaging design was updated as a corrective action for the issue.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
Dr.(b)(6) was performing an isolated pf procedure.The case proceeded normally through bone preparation.After trailing a size 6l pf component and 35 patella the actual implants were visualized by the surgical team and opened for the circulating nurse.Upon physical evaluation of the size 6 left pf implant, the circulating nurse noted that the implant seemed to have a coating on it.(item number 180406 lot 23130911-01).It was noted that the implant did seem to have a film on it.Prior to opening the second "inner" package of the original implant, we obtained a second implant and opened this implant to the circulating nurse.(item number 180406 lot 364360-m) upon visual inspection, the same "film" or powder was noted on this implant.Having only these two implants, the decision was made to use the original implant (item number 180406 lot 26130911-01) to complete the case.Prior to implanting the component was thoroughly washed with a solution of bacitracin and normal saline.After washing the implant was visually inspected for debris and none were noted.The implant was then implanted per standard procedure and the case was completed without further issue.Sales rep provided that surgical delay was 3 minutes.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|