• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK MITEK VAPR PREMIERE 90 DEGREE SUCTION ELECTRODE; ELECTROSURGICAL: CUTTING AND COAGULATING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK MITEK VAPR PREMIERE 90 DEGREE SUCTION ELECTRODE; ELECTROSURGICAL: CUTTING AND COAGULATING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 227204
Device Problems Suction Problem (2170); Unknown (for use when the device problem is not known) (2204)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 04/10/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Patient was operated for arthroscopy of the right shoulder.At the end of the procedure, a redness occurred on her forearm.After the surgery, occurrence of a burn on another surface of 15cm * 5cm at the forearm.Dressing + biafine.Information of the patient.Recommendation for enforcement biafine and monitoring at home.Consultation with the surgeon to follow the (b)(6) 2015.The following additional information was received via email from our affiliate on (b)(6) 2015; according to the sales rep who met the surgeon and the o.R.Nurse last week, the patient is fine.The burn is quite important but the patient¿s shoulder is ok.The surgery is successful and the patient is well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Attempts have been made to retrieve additional information about the event and device.The additional information will reportedly be forwarded to depuy synthes mitek however it is not known if it will be received within the 30 day reporting requirement, therefore depuy synthes mitek would like to file this initial medwatch report at this time.When and if additional information is received it will be reflected in a follow-up medwatch report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device is not being returned, therefore is unavailable for a physical evaluation.The product instructions for use states; ¿ensure that fluid inflow and outflow is adequate and that the electrode is activated only when surrounded by conductive irrigant solution (e.G., saline or ringer¿s lactate).The use of rf energy with inadequate irrigation may overheat the fluid enough to cause skin burns at or near the access site and may result in damage to the electrode tip assembly.¿ the ifu also states ¿for electrodes with suction, attach the suction adapter to standard hospital suction equipment.Ensure that the roller clamp is open, and vacuum is in the range of 300 mmhg to 700 mmhg.¿ a batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any kind for this lot of (b)(4) devices that were released to distribution.We cannot discern a root cause for the reported failure mode, although one possible root cause is inadequate irrigation / suction resulting in the patient burn from overheating of fluid.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Event Description
Patient was operated for arthroscopy of the right shoulder.At the end of the procedure, a redness occurred on her forearm.After the surgery, occurrence of a burn on another surface of 15cm * 5cm at the forearm.Dressing + biafine.Information of the patient.Recommendation for enforcement biafine and monitoring at home.Consultation with the surgeon to follow (b)(6) 2015.The following additional information was received via email from our affiliate on may 22, 2015; according to the sales rep who met the surgeon and the o.R.Nurse last week, the patient is fine.The burn is quite important but the patient's shoulder is ok.The surgery is successful and the patient is well.The following additional information was received from our affiliate on june 3, 2015; the patient's burn was only located on the patient's forearm.The electrode was new and used a maximum of 20 minutes.The suction tube of the electrode was connected.The customer was using an arthroscopic pump from arthrex for suction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITEK VAPR PREMIERE 90 DEGREE SUCTION ELECTRODE
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL: CUTTING AND COAGULATING
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
na
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
david primmerman
325 paramount drive
quality department
raynham, MA 02767
8003824682
MDR Report Key4815999
MDR Text Key15129492
Report Number1221934-2015-00810
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K113545
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor,company repres
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/03/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2017
Device Catalogue Number227204
Device Lot NumberU1412017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/07/2015
Device Age3 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/07/2015
Date Manufacturer Received05/07/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-