• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: UMKIRCH HAMMER 700 GRAMS; HAMMER, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

UMKIRCH HAMMER 700 GRAMS; HAMMER, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 399.430
Device Problems Dent in Material (2526); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 04/13/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during the surgery a fracture of the hammer has loosened and hit the surgeon at the lip.There was a surgical delay of 4 minutes.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient information not reported.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 07.May.2010.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation summary was performed.Our investigation of the complained hammer have shown, that the present hammer is in a desolate condition.The blow surfaces show significant metal - chippings , also the shaft has dents on surface of possible hits.It is likely that violent hammer blows have led to a hardening of the material and this as a result of further hammer blows (over the years / article was manufactured may 2010) has favored the formation of chips.The instrument was analysed for conformance to print specifications, as well as the device history records were researched.No abnormal findings were identified.The device was used many times.Based on these findings we conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances, but excessive mechanical overload.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HAMMER 700 GRAMS
Type of Device
HAMMER, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
UMKIRCH
im kirchenhurstle 4
umkirch b. freiburg D-79 224
GM  D-79224
Manufacturer (Section G)
UMKIRCH
im kirchenhurstle 4
umkirch b. freiburg D-79 224
GM   D-79224
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key4819587
MDR Text Key15247664
Report Number3003862213-2015-10024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FZY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PEXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/13/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/04/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number399.430
Device Lot Number3431931
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/29/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/07/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-