• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. XENMATRIX

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. XENMATRIX Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1161015
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Prolapse (2475)
Event Date 04/30/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The following allegation was reported to davol by the patient: the patient has alleged that in 2010 she underwent the removal of approximately six inches of intestine to relieve constant constipation and reduce rectal prolapse.Patient states the prolapse was reduced by securing the colon and strengthening the pelvic floor with the use of stitches.The patient alleges that she again prolapsed and on (b)(6) 2012 she was implanted with a bard xenmatrix graft during a post menopausal hysterectomy, oopherectomy and laparoscopic rectopexy repair procedure.The patient alleges that in (b)(6) 2015, she began noticing a bulge in the rectal area and feeling extreme pain.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient alleges that she underwent a surgical procedure for removal of appendix, which has been determined to be the cause of her extreme pain.She alleges that during this procedure, the xenmatrix graft was also removed due to recurrent prolapse.The patient reports that her physician noted extreme inflammation and poor incorporation of the graft.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information provided we are unable to determine to what extent, if any, the bard device may have caused or contributed to the events as alleged.Medical records have not been provided and based on the patient's reported medical/surgical history and that "poor incorporation of the graft" was noted upon explant currently it is unknown whether the graft was implanted into healthy well-vascularized tissue.The ifu states "place device in maximum possible contact with healthy, well-vascularized tissue to promote ingrowth and tissue remodeling".Additionally, recurrent and inflammation are both identified in the adverse action section of ifu as possible complications.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.If additional information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.Note: section a through d - the information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable to unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bart.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is an addendum to the initial mdr.The information provided in the maude event report was somewhat different than the information that was stated by the patient to davol and then documented in the initial mdr.Therefore, this supplemental mdr is sent to document the information obtained from the maude event report.No conclusion can be made.Based on the information reported the patient prolapsed again.Patient indicates that the device used did not incorporate.If additional information is provided a supplement mdr will be submitted.
 
Event Description
The following is an addendum to the initial mdr and reported to davol via maude event report (mw5042586): "i had pigskin mesh put in for rectal prolapse.It was attached from my stomach to my rectum.Immediately after the mesh was inserted i started to have problems.My ob/gyn doctor could feel the mesh and see that it was not attached where it should be.I was having pain in my hips and numbness that went down my leg.I was also unable to work.I saw 7 different doctors and it took 1 1/2 years before they decided to take the mesh out.The operating doctor said the mesh never attached, it floated around and tried to attach to my appendix, therefore, i had to remove my appendix also.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XENMATRIX
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC.
warwick RI
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
laura berg
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258462
MDR Report Key4827904
MDR Text Key5901096
Report Number1213643-2015-00187
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTM
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K081272
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,consumer,other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/13/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/01/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2013
Device Catalogue Number1161015
Device Lot NumberHUVEBLO2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/12/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
-
-