Catalog Number 03.501.080 |
Device Problem
Sticking (1597)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a trigger is sticky on an application instrument for zipfix.Noticed during routine check in sterile processing.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Manufacturing site: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 14.Nov.2013, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No ncrs were generated during production.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The date of this report and date received by manufacturer were incorrectly reported on the initial medwatch report and should have been reported as jun 8, 2015, not jun 18, 2015.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An investigation summary was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: one of the following device(s) was received: sternal zipfix applicator (part # 03.501.080 | lot # 8668467), the returned device shows light use during its 1.5+ year lifespan.The handle, body and trigger mechanism is in excellent condition.The trigger operates as intended and no issues were found with the returned devices.The complaint condition could not be replicated and the cause of the complaint condition is unknown.A visual inspection, functional test, drawing review, and dhr review were performed as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed or found with the returned device, therefore a corrective action is not warranted.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|